Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 6:07:02 GMT
Yolanda Diaz Díaz, Minister of Labor and second vice president of the progressive coalition Government, represents and coordinates Unidas Podemos and its confluences in the Executive ( Catalunya en Comú Podem and Galicia en comun , of which she is a deputy). She has been proposed by these parties to lead the shared candidacy for the next general elections, through a broad front. We have, therefore, the perspective of a renewed political platform and the formation of new leadership, although she is only taking the first steps and has not communicated her definitive commitment. I have had the opportunity to analyze the abandonment of the institutional policy of Pablo Iglesias, former leader of Podemos and representative of the confederal political space of Unidas Podemos and its allies, as well as the task of forming new leaderships in the more general framework explained in the book " Prospects for progressive change ”. Returning to this diagnosis, I summarize here the contributions and insufficiencies of the controversial political and organizational management of the previous leadership to expose some axes to take into account in the new political stage that begins.
It is about explaining the elements of continuity, renewal and adaptation to the new socioeconomic and political problems and, particularly, with a view to promoting the space for progress change. Discerning and combining the three tasks and their content is, at times, complex and has an impact on the orientation, in this case, of the forces of change. I do not go into the nuances of its name, call it broad front, left Australia Phone Number of the PSOE, alternative space or violet, green and red, platform of progress, historical bloc... There remains a democratic path, of consultation and participation, for the programmatic elaboration and profile of the country project, as well as for the political, plural and democratic articulation, with the negotiation of the different organizational levels and their role and composition, starting from the representative reality and recent experience : leadership (called political-institutional representation, confederal coordination, leading or governing nucleus...), party and personal structuring with its rebalances and the consolidation and broadening of a broad socio-political and electoral base. I am going to refer, above all, to two interrelated aspects that Yolanda Díaz herself, from her own political tradition, has already advanced as difficulties to overcome: avoiding 'noise' in political action, and discarding 'egos' in organizational structure.
Let's see, in a deeper way and from critical political sociology, the meaning and dimension of these two internal problems to channel the most appropriate and collective treatment of it. A positive experience, with difficulties and insufficiencies First of all, it should be noted that, together with its political formation, the previous leadership represented by Pablo Iglesias has dared to challenge the established power and propose a profound social and democratic transformation, representing the interests and demands of the popular classes, a democratization of the political and institutional system and a confederal articulation of the plurinationality of the State. And this, with firmness and honesty. It has been a symbol that has expressed the crisis of the ruling two-party system and the configuration of a new, more open and plural political system, with the recognition of the forces of change and progress. It has represented the commitment of a transformative progressive dynamic, initiated more than a decade ago by a broad sociopolitical field outraged by the regressive and authoritarian management of the dominant elites of the previous two-party system. All of this has been unforgivable for the different groups of established power and their different terminal agencies, from the police-media sewers to the institutional and economic power groups.
It is about explaining the elements of continuity, renewal and adaptation to the new socioeconomic and political problems and, particularly, with a view to promoting the space for progress change. Discerning and combining the three tasks and their content is, at times, complex and has an impact on the orientation, in this case, of the forces of change. I do not go into the nuances of its name, call it broad front, left Australia Phone Number of the PSOE, alternative space or violet, green and red, platform of progress, historical bloc... There remains a democratic path, of consultation and participation, for the programmatic elaboration and profile of the country project, as well as for the political, plural and democratic articulation, with the negotiation of the different organizational levels and their role and composition, starting from the representative reality and recent experience : leadership (called political-institutional representation, confederal coordination, leading or governing nucleus...), party and personal structuring with its rebalances and the consolidation and broadening of a broad socio-political and electoral base. I am going to refer, above all, to two interrelated aspects that Yolanda Díaz herself, from her own political tradition, has already advanced as difficulties to overcome: avoiding 'noise' in political action, and discarding 'egos' in organizational structure.
Let's see, in a deeper way and from critical political sociology, the meaning and dimension of these two internal problems to channel the most appropriate and collective treatment of it. A positive experience, with difficulties and insufficiencies First of all, it should be noted that, together with its political formation, the previous leadership represented by Pablo Iglesias has dared to challenge the established power and propose a profound social and democratic transformation, representing the interests and demands of the popular classes, a democratization of the political and institutional system and a confederal articulation of the plurinationality of the State. And this, with firmness and honesty. It has been a symbol that has expressed the crisis of the ruling two-party system and the configuration of a new, more open and plural political system, with the recognition of the forces of change and progress. It has represented the commitment of a transformative progressive dynamic, initiated more than a decade ago by a broad sociopolitical field outraged by the regressive and authoritarian management of the dominant elites of the previous two-party system. All of this has been unforgivable for the different groups of established power and their different terminal agencies, from the police-media sewers to the institutional and economic power groups.